The Ryzen 5 7500F is AMD’s most inexpensive Zen 4-based processor that originally launched for the Chinese language market solely. Extra lately, it has been sighted in US and European retailers nevertheless it’s nonetheless a little bit of an elusive providing. On this overview, we’ll be evaluating it head-to-head with its nearest Thirteenth-gen Intel competitor, the Core i5-13400F. We imagine this is likely to be its closest competitor based mostly on anticipated pricing within the world market.
The excitement means that the 7500F ought to be obtainable worldwide with an MSRP of $180, providing a notable low cost in comparison with the $230 asking worth of the Ryzen 5 7600. This distinction is important for the reason that 7500F is actually a 7600 with the built-in graphics disabled.
Basically, AMD appears to be adopting Intel’s naming conference, a transfer that clarifies product variations for customers. Not like chipset names, the place Intel has the B560, B660, and B760 and AMD has the B550 and B650. The “F” designation denotes an absence of iGPU assist for Intel CPUs, and now that additionally applies to AMD choices.
The “F” designation denotes an absence of iGPU assist for Intel CPUs, and now that additionally applies to AMD choices.
Nevertheless, one may assume {that a} Ryzen 5 7600 with out the iGPU can be named the 7600F, as a substitute AMD has chosen the 7500F moniker. The selection turns into clearer whenever you discover one other tweak: the bottom and enhance clock speeds have been decreased by 100 MHz. This 2-3% discount in working frequency implies that AMD might not, or ought to not, keep on with the 7600 branding.
For these not requiring built-in graphics, the 7500F will undoubtedly appeal to these on a finances eager to discover the AM5 platform. If the $180 MSRP holds true, it’s going to be roughly 20% cheaper than the 7600 whereas providing efficiency that is inside a couple of proportion factors.
In the meantime, the Intel Thirteenth-gen counterpart at this worth is the Core i5-13400F, at present priced round $210. Apparently, it dropped to a low of $165 at Finest Purchase earlier this yr for a brief interval.
Most of you might be most likely conversant in the 13400F at this level, however for many who aren’t, it packs 6 P-Cores that may clock as excessive as 4.6 GHz, and 4 E-Cores that may clock as much as 3.3 GHz. There’s additionally 20MB of L3 cache although the L2 relies on the twelfth technology structure, so the P-Cores pack 1.25 MB per core and never 2 MB’s just like the 13600K, whereas the E-cores additionally solely get 2 MB per cluster, not 4MB.
For these eager on constructing a finances gaming PC on the most recent AMD or Intel platforms, the query arises: Ryzen 5 or Core i5? Let’s delve deeper.
In our checks, the 7500F was arrange on the Gigabyte X670E Aorus Grasp utilizing DDR5-6000 CL30 reminiscence. Alternatively, the 13400F was benchmarked on the MSI MPG Z790 Carbon Wi-Fi with DDR5-7200 reminiscence. For graphics, we utilized the Asus ROG Strix RTX 4090 OC Version, benchmarking at resolutions of 1080p, 1440p, and 4K.
Benchmarks
First, let’s check out Fortnite. For CPU testing, we have transitioned to the medium high quality preset for the DX11 outcomes, as this carefully mirrors the standard settings most gamers use, significantly aggressive gamers. The 13400F peaked at 326 fps, whereas the 7500F reached as excessive as 453 fps, representing an nearly 40% efficiency enhance. These outcomes are predominantly CPU-limited; subsequently, even at 4K, the Ryzen 5 processor outperformed by 30%.
Whereas enabling ray tracing can amplify CPU load, in Fortnite, the first performance-limiting element is the RTX 4090. So, there’s minimal distinction right here.
Shifting on to Spider-Man Remastered, we noticed that the 7500F can obtain as much as 179 fps, whereas the 13400F peaks at 155 fps. Whereas each provide easy gameplay, the Ryzen 5 processor demonstrates a 15% benefit on this check. Regardless of utilizing the best high quality settings, the RTX 4090 stays CPU-limited, even at 4K.
For some perspective, the RTX 4060 renders roughly 150 fps at 1080p utilizing the best high quality preset. Though we used the RTX 4090 for this check, it is noteworthy that the 13400F comes near limiting even the 4060’s efficiency on this recreation. Since our focus is CPU efficiency, it is essential to isolate this when providing buying recommendation.
Introducing ray tracing, which tends to extend the CPU’s workload, the 7500F turns into nearly 20% faster at 1080p and stays 13% sooner at 4K, with the 13400F stalling at barely above 110 fps. To offer extra context, the RTX 4060 can render simply past 120 fps at 1080p beneath these settings.
Shadow of the Tomb Raider, launched in 2018, is likely to be older, however it may possibly nonetheless put fashionable CPUs to the check. Each processors surpassed 200 fps, guaranteeing distinctive efficiency from both CPU. Nevertheless, the 7500F took the lead, being 10% sooner at 1080p and 1440p and attaining a 7% improve at 4K.
The Final of Us Half 1 calls for quite a bit from CPUs due to fixed texture streaming. However its ultra-quality settings additionally closely job GPUs, making the sport GPU-limited at 1440p and 4K. At 1080p, the 13400F topped at 141 fps. Though the 7500F did not maximize the RTX 4090’s potential, it nonetheless delivered 11% extra efficiency, averaging 156 fps.
In A Plague Story: Requiem, one other CPU-intensive title, the Ryzen 5 processor outperformed by nearly 20% at each 1080p and 1440p. The outcomes solely grew to become GPU-limited as soon as we scaled to 4K decision.
Hogwarts Legacy additionally places vital stress on the CPU. On this case, the 2 CPUs had been carefully matched, with the 7500F pulling forward by just some frames throughout all examined resolutions.
When ray tracing is enabled, the 7500F features a bit extra of an edge as a result of elevated CPU load. This resulted in a efficiency benefit of as much as 9% for the Ryzen processor at 1440p.
The outcomes for Star Wars Jedi: Survivor had been carefully contested, particularly at 1080p, the place efficiency was primarily CPU-limited. The 7500F pulled forward by simply 4%, yielding a median of 128 fps towards the 13400F’s 123 fps.
Much like Spider-Man Remastered, the Watch Canines: Legion outcomes had been largely CPU-limited, even at 4K. It is price noting that each the RTX 4060 and RX 7600 can obtain round 120 fps at 1080p in these situations, which means the 13400F is not extracting way more from the RTX 4090. On this recreation, the 7500F proved to be 11% sooner at 1080p, 13% at 1440p, and 11% at 4K. We additionally noticed a 17% enhance within the 1% lows at 4K. Regardless of this, the 13400F nonetheless managed to ship easy gameplay.
For Resident Evil 4, each CPUs confronted related efficiency limitations, leading to an identical output ranges.
In Halo Infinite, the 7500F was 14% sooner at 1080p, and when trying on the 1% lows, it was 16% forward. These variations narrowed to 7% for common body charges and 11% for 1% lows at 1440p. Efficiency equalized attributable to GPU limitations at 4K.
The Callisto Protocol showcased some vital efficiency advantages for the Ryzen 5 processor, which was 19-20% sooner at each 1080p and 1440p. By the point we scaled to 4K, outcomes grew to become predominantly GPU-limited. Whereas the 13400F managed a brisk 213 fps at 1080p, a lift of roughly 20% for the 7500F is important.
In Far Cry 6, we noticed noticeable efficiency features for the 7500F. It was 15% sooner at 1080p and curiously, 24% sooner at 1440p. Although one may usually anticipate the margin to slim at 1440p, we have famous cases previously the place growing the decision additionally intensifies CPU load. On this title, at 4K decision, the 13400F seems to be experiencing some type of latency subject. The 7500F nonetheless carried out as much as 10% sooner. This discrepancy is likely to be attributed to Nvidia’s driver overhead affecting the Core i5 greater than the Ryzen 5.
In Name of Responsibility Trendy Warfare II, the 7500F considerably outperformed, producing 26% extra frames at 1080p, reaching 252 fps. Nevertheless, the 1440p knowledge leaned extra in direction of GPU limitations, ensuing within the Ryzen 5 processor being solely 6% sooner. As anticipated, the 4K knowledge was fully GPU constrained.
Hitman 3 showcased a extra aggressive efficiency, significantly when evaluating the 1% lows. Nonetheless, the 7500F was 8% sooner at 1080p and 9% sooner at 1440p when it comes to common body charge. Even at 4K, the 7500F maintained a 6% lead.
Whereas benchmarking Baldur’s Gate 3, we targeted on the situation Baldur’s Gate, figuring out it as one of the crucial CPU-intensive sections of the sport we have encountered. The outcomes had been intriguing: the 13400F and 7500F delivered nearly an identical efficiency at 1080p. Nevertheless, even when the variations at 1440p and 4K weren’t stark, they broadened to favor the Ryzen processor. At 4K, the 7500F led by 6%.
Concluding with F1 23, it was a transparent victory for the 7500F. The processor was 25% sooner at each 1080p and 1440p, marking a major efficiency enhance. It is price noting that each CPUs nonetheless ensured a easy gameplay expertise.
Energy Consumption
When it comes to energy consumption, the 7500F and 13400F are fairly comparable. The Ryzen processor usually consumes barely extra energy, and we noticed a median whole system utilization improve by 22 watts. Nevertheless, this does not consider the truth that the Ryzen processor was sooner, and subsequently pushed the GPU to work tougher, so let’s check out efficiency per watt.
Concerning efficiency per watt, the 7500F proves to be the extra environment friendly gaming processor, albeit by a small margin. We’re taking a look at a mere 3% effectivity benefit based mostly on this knowledge, rendering energy utilization comparatively insignificant in a comparability of those two elements.
Efficiency Abstract
Analyzing efficiency throughout the 26 recreation configurations, on common, the 7500F yielded 12% extra efficiency. Its most substantial lead was in Fortnite, adopted by Name of Responsibility after which F1 23 – all titles that showcased considerably excessive body charges. Nevertheless, there was a single occasion the place the 7500F lagged, evident throughout checks with The Riftbreaker.
For the 1% lows, the outcomes align carefully: general, the 7500F is 9% sooner, and predominantly, the video games the place the Ryzen processor excelled stay constant.
Shifting to 1440p decreased the general result in 10%, a minor decline in comparison with 1080p. The 7500F’s standout performances had been in Fortnite and F1 23, with substantial developments additionally noticed in Far Cry 6, The Callisto Protocol, and Horizon Zero Daybreak.
The margin for the 1% lows at 1440p is barely tighter at 8%, but it stays a good lead for the Ryzen 5. Video games like Far Cry 6 and Fortnite noticed will increase surpassing 20%.
On the GPU-constrained 4K decision, the 7500F was on common 5% sooner. Nevertheless, right here we’re primarily testing graphics efficiency and never uncooked CPU output, so it is important to strategy this knowledge cautiously.
We noticed a mere 4% enchancment for the 7500F at 4K when evaluating the 1% lows. Most checks confirmed margins of 5% or much less, with CPU-constrained titles at decrease settings, akin to Fortnite, contributing to this general proportion.
Entry-Stage AM5 FTW
For budget-conscious avid gamers, the Ryzen 5 7500F presents a compelling choice, significantly if priced at $180 or much less, although its precise retail worth stays to be seen. On condition that the Ryzen 7600 is on the market for $220 at sure shops, it is crucial for the 7500F to be priced beneath $200 to make sense.
Moreover, it is price noting that the 7500F is bundled with the Wraith Stealth field cooler, very similar to the 7600, so you do not have to spend any extra money on a cooler, when you do not need to.
In the event you’re contemplating constructing a brand new gaming PC, the Core i5-13400 would not seem to supply a convincing argument. It is probably pricier, and as our outcomes point out, it constantly lags in gaming efficiency, at instances considerably. It is price protecting in thoughts that we had been utilizing dearer DDR5-7200 reminiscence with the Intel CPU.
For these eyeing productiveness, the 13400 and its E-Cores cluster do not constantly outperform the 7500F. In a number of functions, it’d even be slower. Nevertheless, usually, they may have a carefully matched efficiency. If productiveness is your major focus, the Core i5-13500, priced at $250, is a greater match because it boasts twice as many E-Cores. With the Ryzen 7 7700 tagged at $330, the 13500 lacks direct competitors.
We should always notice that Intel has lately slashed the Core i5-12600K’s worth to $185 – a stellar provide. Whereas not considerably sooner than the 13400F out of the field, it may be overclocked.
With the Ryzen 5 7500F anticipated at ~$180, it ought to be usually sooner than the 12600K for gaming whereas utilizing much less energy – that is a comparability price exploring sooner or later.
The prospect of a Zen 4 processor beneath $200 is thrilling, and we’re keen to identify the 7500F on cabinets, hopefully on the projected worth level. A possible problem is likely to be its availability, on condition that AMD depends on faulty silicon with out a practical iGPU to fabricate the 7500F. Due to this fact, based mostly on its recognition, it might show elusive in inventory.
Purchasing Shortcuts:
#AMD #Ryzen #7500F #Inexpensive #Zen #CPU
